Description

This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.

The following conditions must be met to conduct successful attack:

• The application uses environment variables.
• The environment variable exposed to the user is vulnerable to a buffer overflow.
• The vulnerable environment variable uses untrusted data.
• Tainted data used in the environment variables is not properly validated. For instance boundary checking is not done before copying

the input data to a buffer.

Examples

Furthermore the attacker performs the following steps:

• The attacker tries to find an environment variable which can be overwritten for instance by gathering information about the target

host (error pages, software's version number, hostname, etc.).

• The attacker manipulates the environment variable to contain excessive-length content to cause a buffer overflow.
• The attacker potentially leverages the buffer overflow to inject maliciously crafted code in an attempt to execute privileged command on the target environment.

Example1

Application below gets information about its run environment from environment variables.

rezos@dojo-labs ~/owasp/buffer_overflow $ cat bo_env.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main(void)
{
       char *ptr_h;
       char h[64];

       ptr_h = getenv("HOME");
       if(ptr_h != NULL) {
               sprintf(h, "Your home directory is: %s !", ptr_h);
               printf("%s\n", h);
       }

       return 0;
}

Application checks the value of the environment variable HOME (path to the home directory) and stores it. It is done by calling getenv(3) library function in GNU/Linux. If return value of this function is different than NULL (NULL value means that variable is not set), then message is created by calling sprintf(3). This function doesn't validate the length of the string, which is going to be written in the targer 64 char size buffer - h[].

Common program execution:

rezos@dojo-labs ~/owasp/buffer_overflow $ ./bo_env
Your home directory is: /home/rezos !

Now let's change the value of HOME to 128 'A' characters.

rezos@dojo-labs ~/owasp/buffer_overflow $ export HOME=`perl -e 'print "A"x128'`

When we run program again, to the buffer h[64] is copied a message, which has length of (assuming sizeof(char) = 1):

strlen("Your home directory is:  !") + strlen(ptr_h) = 28 + 128 = 156

rezos@dojo-labs /home/rezos/owasp/buffer_overflow $ ./bo_env
Your home directory is:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
!
Segmentation fault
rezos@dojo-labs /home/rezos/owasp/buffer_overflow $

Program ended with memory segmentation fault, buffer h[] was overwritten. Using environment variables themselves is not a problem. The real problem is when application lacks their proper validation - size and content. More information about errors related to buffer overflows may be found in the Buffer_overflow_attack article.

Code injection is performed in the same common way like in buffer overflow attacks with only one difference. The shellcode is placed in environment variable(s).